Latest The Office Spoilers from USA Today and TV Guide
Photo courtesy of Sparklies Org
A big thing between Jim and Pam…Pam’s quirks…problems with the Dunder Mifflin website…and who could be leaving? (My guess is either Jan or Ryan!) All these are coming up this spring on The Office…
And so, that I don’t ruin it for you, you can read it all after the cut.
What viewers can expect this spring: Michael’s interest in a woman modeling in an office supply catalog; Michael and Dwight clubbing with hotshot Ryan (B.J. Novak), a supervisor who was once a subordinate; and Ryan’s problems with sexual predators accessing the company’s website. “The character of Ryan is getting a little out of control,” Daniels says.
Somebody will be leaving Dunder-Mifflin, too. “It’s kind of a shocker,” Fischer says. “It’s not me and it’s not Steve. I can say that.”
Fischer, who says the six post-strike scripts rank with the show’s best, says the dinner party provides an interesting glimpse into the Jim-Pam relationship outside the office. “That’s kind of cool for fans of Jim and Pam,” whose numbers are substantial.
In a later episode, viewers will learn one of Pam’s quirks that comes out at the office after she has spent the night at Jim’s place. “Michael and everybody have a good time with that, teasing her about it.”
Question: From one Smurf fan to another, can you give any additional hints as to which of your options — engagement, elopement, breaking up or having sex — is the “big stuff” in store for Jim and Pam on The Office?— Kathryn
Ausiello: I have a better idea. How ’bout I eliminate one of the options from the mix? I can confirm that the “big stuff” does not involve any sort of Jam split. That leaves engagement, elopement and having sex as the three remaining possibilities. Look for the fieldto narrow even further tomorrow night (April 17) between 9-9:30 pm/ET.
Question: Can you give us more about the big Jim-Pam spoiler on The Office? — C.
Ausiello: Neither Jim nor Pam is currently hiding a drug problem. But someone else is.
Leave a Reply